Twenty-five minutes. No verdicts.
I keep running into the same thing. Two people inside the same company, looking at the same number, disagreeing about what it means. I don't think that's a data problem, and I don't have the full picture of it yet. So I'm asking the people who sit at the top how data actually works from where they sit.
No preparation, no slides, no numbers to defend. Long enough for a 5K, and if we run over it usually means we found something.
What changed
Shorter, and built the other way round.
Season one ran eleven episodes. Someone brought a real problem and we worked it through on air, properly, for forty minutes at a time. The conversations were good and I would stand behind any of them.
The limit was the format, not the people. Solving one company's specific problem takes that long, and it only really lands for you if it happens to be your problem too. That is a lot of time to ask of someone for a situation that is not theirs.
So season two keeps the collaboration and drops the board. Twenty-five minutes, a conversation rather than a working session, and the subject is how data actually works from where you sit.
Season one is still worth your time. It is all in the archive.
How it works
Three steps. Nothing to prepare.
You say yes
Leave your details and a couple of slots that work. That's the whole ask.
We talk
Twenty-five minutes on LinkedIn Live. A couple of questions I ask everyone, then wherever the conversation goes.
It ships
Edited and published on Substack, Spotify and Apple. You hear it before anyone else does, and if something in it does not sit right, I cut it.
Want to come on the show?
Twenty-five minutes and a real conversation about how data lands where you sit. Nothing to prepare.
Come on the show